Question 1:
Does Jesus or others of the Ascended Host have any thoughts
on the
big oil spill in the Gulf Of Mexico?
Question 2: Right at this time a huge amount of oil is
leaking into
the Gulf of Mexico, killing wildlife and fishing beds, and
fouling
beaches. I have already posted a YouTube clip of Elizabeth
Clare
Prophet to my Facebook page, in which video she mentions the
clearing
that the violet fire can do of environmental hazards. Do
you have
any other suggestion for a powerful and intense way to deal
with this
situation? Any specific rosary which would be best for
this?
Question 3: Ted Turner recently said that he thinks the
Mexican Gulf
oil spill is God telling us, “Don’t drill.” Do the masters
have any
comments on that?
Answer from Saint
Germain, May 28, 2010:
Given that we have now entered the Aquarian age, everything
has changed,
as
I said recently.
And that means that everything needs to be re-thought.
You cannot simply take things for granted, you cannot
continue with
the same mindset that you had in the previous age. You
cannot assume
that what worked well and what seemed right in the previous
age is
also going to be right in the Age of Aquarius. This would
indeed be
a misunderstanding of the shift that has happened with the
planet
entering the Aquarian age.
Concerning the oil spill, the first thing that needs to be
completely
rethought is the attitude that human beings have to nature.
This attitude
is indeed a complete product of the consciousness of
separation, whereby
human beings have come to see themselves as completely
separated from
God above and from the material universe here below—and also
separated
from each other. This, of course, is the cause of the
conflict and
warfare that you have seen on this planet, but it is also
the cause
of many other behaviors and actions that can at first seem
to be perfectly
normal—but are actually not what should be normal, if human
beings
had a deeper connection to the inner reality that they are
spiritual
beings and not material beings.
You have – as is always the case in the duality
consciousness – two
extremes when it comes to people's view of nature. On the
one hand
you have the view that people are completely separated from
nature
but that they – either because they are created by God or
because
they are the most sophisticated life forms produced by
evolution –
have a right to forcefully subdue nature. This is obviously
an aspect
of the consciousness of separation, where man sees himself
separated
from nature, sees himself in conflict with nature, and
therefore thinks
he has the right to do whatever he needs to do in order to
subdue
nature and make it do what man thinks nature should do
This is the viewpoint that you see, in this particular
situation,
represented by the large corporations, such as BP and other
oil exploring
corporations around the world. They believe that they have a
right
to do whatever is technologically possible and economically
feasible
in order to secure the greatest possible profit for the
corporations
and their shareholders, regardless of the potential risk it
has for
nature. These corporations do not consider nature at all;
they only
consider nature in a secondary way in terms of what economic
risk
it might represent if there is a spill and they have to
spend money
cleaning it up. In other words, the corporations have no
regard for
nature whatsoever, as they have no regard for the lives of
their own
employees—as is also witnessed in this disaster.
The opposite extreme is, of course, the viewpoint taken by
the environmental
organizations and by many people who over recent decades
have become
more sensitive to nature but have not found the middle way.
Instead,
they have been pulled into the opposite dualistic extreme,
represented
by the environmentalist movement. This is the view that
nature is
something pristine, something almost sacred—although most of
these
people are not religious. Therefore, nature existed as some
Paradise
that was pure before man entered the stage and started
messing things
up. And thus, it is somehow wrong that human beings have any
impact
on nature and they should preferably live completely
separated from
nature and in a way that has minimum impact on
nature—whatever that
might mean.
Now, on the one hand you will realize that this does
represent somewhat
of a respect and reverence for nature, yet it is still a
respect and
reverence that springs from the consciousness of separation,
because
it again affirms man's separation from nature. Nature is
something
“out there” that should be kept in some condition that –
whether real
or imagined – existed before man, especially modern man,
entered the
stage. Both of these positions sprang from the consciousness
of separation,
where man sees himself separated from the environment in
which he
lives, from the planet upon which he lives.
None of these attitudes are sustainable in the Age of
Aquarius; none
of them will survive in the Golden Age. They must both be
transcended
before the golden age attitude to nature can become
widespread on
this planet. What, then, is the middle way that is not
between – as
a compromise between the dualistic extremes – but transcends
the dualistic
scale? Well, it is to recognize one simple fact: man is not
separated
from nature because the connecting link between man and
nature is
indeed consciousness.
As scientists have begun to realize, and as this messenger has
written about, the underlying reality beneath all
material appearances
is consciousness. Everything is created out of
consciousness. Therefore,
the entire planet is created by an image being superimposed
upon the
Ma-ter light by self-aware beings, called the Elohim. Yet
since human
beings first started taking embodiment, the consciousness of
human
beings has indeed had a major impact on the conditions
currently found
on this planet.
This means that there are absolutely no conditions on this
planet
that are pristine in the sense that they are not affected by
the consciousness
of man. Did you hear what I just said? There are no
conditions whatsoever
that are not affected by the consciousness of humankind! It
is a complete
fallacy, a complete creation of dualistic imagination, that
there
is such a thing as nature untouched by man. It may seem so
on the
physical level, but it is not true when you consider the
reality that
everything is consciousness.
Another fallacy promoted by the environmentalist movement is
that
it is wrong for human beings to influence the environment.
This, of
course, is not true. Why is there a physical planet? Do you
think
that the Elohim just created this planet in order to have it
sit here
in some huge empty space for an indefinite period of time?
No, they
created it for one purpose only: to serve as a schoolroom
for the
self-aware beings that would be embodying here. There is
absolutely
no other purpose or justification for the existence of the
Earth than
to serve as a schoolroom for humankind.
That means that nature, as far as it has consciousness,
knows that
it is here to serve humankind. It is not here to outpicture
some Edenic,
pristine state; it is here to serve as a mirror that
reflects back
to humankind whatever they project out with their
consciousness. Do
you see: nature is a giant biofeedback machine for
humankind. Nature
is perfectly content – the Ma-ter light is perfectly content
– to
serve in this role. Elemental life is perfectly content to
serve in
this role. All animal species, as far as they have group
awareness,
are content to serve in this role.
It is not the purpose of nature – or rather the spiritual
beings who
manifest nature – to create or to return to some pristine
state. It
is the purpose exclusively to serve as a learning
environment for
humankind. With this in mind, you realize that this latest
oil spill
is simply a lesson from the cosmic schoolroom. It is another
example
of humankind seeing a reflection of a certain state of
consciousness.
Thus, let me comment first on the idea that you might use
the violet
flame or rosaries
to mitigate the effects of this disaster. Is this
necessarily the
right approach in the Age of Aquarius? Well, yes and no. You
see,
we have not commented on this particular incident earlier
because
it was never our intent to prevent this incident or to stop
it at
the earliest possible stage. There are many times where we
of the
Ascended Host simply realize that even if we can stop
certain events,
it is not in the best interest of humankind to do so. It is
indeed
sometimes necessary to allow humankind to see the physical
consequences
of their actions and their state of consciousness.
Thus, we have no desire to see our students use their time,
attention
and energy on decreeing or giving rosaries in order to
mitigate something
that is a learning experience—and therefore must be allowed
to unfold.
That being said, now that the event has unfolded and now
that humankind
has received its opportunity to learn a lesson, then it is
appropriate
to use spiritual tools in order to make it easier for nature
to reestablish
the environment after the disaster. It can therefore be
appropriate
to use violet flame decrees and the rosaries given through
this messenger
as a way to lighten the burden on elemental life, so that
they can
more quickly restore natural conditions to the areas that
have been
or will be in the future affected by this oil spill.
It is also appropriate to give rosaries and decrees in order
to help
humankind learn the lessons that need to be learned. And so,
let me
move on to comment on those lessons. The first lesson that
needs to
be learned here is that this oil spill is the next lesson –
lesson
number two – in the process that began with the financial
crisis and
the so-called meltdown on Wall Street. I have the earlier
commented
on the economic
crisis, and I have also raised several questions,
including the
fact that one cannot allow corporations
to become so large that they can manipulate nations or even
the entire
world economy.
I also said that one cannot, in the Golden Age, allow free
enterprise
to run completely free without transparency and therefore
government
oversight and regulation. This holds true for the financial
industry,
but it holds true for any area of business. And another area
of business
where you see very large multinational corporations – that
due to
their money can buy influence – is of course in the oil
industry.
There is hardly any industry that has a greater impact on
the global
economy than the oil industry. Therefore, it is only a
natural part
of the process of exposing what needs to be exposed for
society to
enter the Golden age, that the oil industry has now been
exposed for
exactly what it is: huge multinational corporations that
have no respect
for human life and no respect for the environment. These
corporations
are concerned about only one thing: profit, profit and
profit.
These huge corporations are simply mindless machines,
mindless structures,
that will grind to dust any individual, any nation and any
natural
condition that stands in the way of their never-ending,
mindless quest
for greater and greater profit. Nobody has the capacity to
ask why
a corporation needs to make such huge profits. Nobody has
the presence
of mind to ask when there comes a point, where this is no
longer in
the interest of humankind as a whole or a particular nation.
No one,
for that matter, has the presence of mind to ask whether
this really
is in the interest of the corporation and its shareholders
in the
long run.
For you can look at this particular incident, and you can
very clearly
see that it started with certain managers at the BP oil
company who
wanted to shut down the well in a way that was the least
costly and
therefore seemingly would generate the biggest profit. Yet
given that
they have now lost an oil platform that cost a quarter of a
billion
dollars – and that the cleanup will cost even more than the
company's
quarterly profit of the last quarter – was this really in
the interest
of profit? And so, you see that even from a strict profit
viewpoint,
there needs to be some way to provide a greater perspective
into the
corporate world.
This would, of course, ideally come from enlightened CEOs
and shareholders.
Yet for decades now, the profit machine has systematically
eliminated
any CEO or shareholder who would question this mindless
quest for
profit. And thus, it simply is not possible for the
industry, for
the corporations, to regulate themselves. And this, of
course, leads
to only one practical solution, namely that the government
must step
in. However, this should be seen as a short-term measure,
for in the
long run the reality is that the people must step up and
become more
aware and more involved and put greater demands both on
their government
and the corporations that operate in their countries, even
on a worldwide
basis.
An entirely new willingness to examine every aspect of
society needs
to emerge, so that people get engaged, so they take charge,
and so
they raise the questions that need to be raised. Even so
that they
demand a new type of media that will not be silenced by the
threat
of withdrawing advertising money, so they do not report on a
particular
issue for fear of financial consequences. Again, the media
being driven
by profit, which of course is not sustainable in the Golden
Age.
So what you see here is the absolute need for the government
to step
in at many different levels. There needs to be some
institutional
think tank who can raise the question: does the fact that we
CAN drill
at such extreme depth in the ocean mean that we SHOULD drill
under
those conditions? And if we do allow drilling, can we allow
one or
two corporations to be completely in charge of this, or do
we need
to have some outside perspective, such as a government
representative
who could have been present on that oil platform when the
shutdown
procedure was determined and decided upon. Thus, such a
representative
would have been able to override the short-term profit view
that caused
the cheapest and most unsafe measure to be selected, against
the advice
of several other people.
Yet stepping even further back from the issue, we again see
the question
of the size of corporations. Is it possible that when a
corporation
grows beyond a certain size, that it is actually manageable
by human
beings? Does any one person, does any small group of people,
have
the mental capacity to oversee a corporation beyond a
certain size?
This is a question that needs to be debated. This, of
course, goes
for another so-called “corporation,” namely the government.
Is it
possible that any one person or any small group of people,
such as
the President of the United States and his cabinet, can have
the mental
capacity to oversee a country of the size and complexity of
the United
States?
The reality is, of course, that no single person in
embodiment has
that capacity. Therefore, there needs to be found a new
approach to
management, which goes beyond the traditional elitist
approach—that
was created and has been sustained by various power elite
groups who
think they are capable of running society. Yet this elitist
nonsense
needs to be exposed for what it is, and it needs to be
recognized
that if the management of a country or corporation is
allowed to become
a closed system, then the second law of thermodynamics will
cause
that system to break down—much faster now that we have
entered the
Aquarian age. Thus, a new approach to management is needed,
one that
deliberately seeks to prevent any organization from becoming
a closed
system.
This has – as everything else in life – an Alpha and an
Omega aspect,
but the underlying principle is that management must be
opened up
to outside perspectives. The Alpha side is that enlightened
leaders
are those who have developed their intuitive, spiritual
faculties
and are thus capable of receiving input from the Ascended
Host. Why
is America supposed to be “one nation under God?” Because
the founding
fathers recognized that no human authority can govern justly
unless
there is input from above. And we will, of course, gladly
give such
assistance to anyone who is open to it—regardless of whether
the leader
recognize us as ascended masters or conceives of “assistance
from
above” in some other way. Yet what I am truly saying here is
that
no large structure will survive in the Aquarian age unless
it has
one or more leaders with at least some degree of personal
Christhood.
The Omega aspect is to spread the leadership responsibility
among
enough people that they together have the capacity to
understand what
is going on—and can therefore take into consideration
everything that
needs to be considered for viable decisions to be made. I
would also
like to point out that this, in the end, cannot be left to a
small
group of people. There needs to be established a greater
connection
between what goes on in these narrow leadership circles and
the greater
public. The public needs to be involved, so that there can
be a more
varied input before major decisions are made. It is
necessary with
a new awareness that all major decisions will affect society
as a
whole, and thus decisions must be made by considering all
perspectives—and
not just the short-term profit interests of a corporation,
such as
an oil company.
This will require a new mindset, whereby people are willing
to sacrifice
part of their free time in order to educate themselves to
the point,
where they do become real experts in a particular field. Yet
they
do not become pulled into the machine, they do not become
insiders
who look at the situation from the inside out. Instead, they
stay
clear of the machine, so that they can look at it from an
outsider's
perspective but still with the expertise to know what is
truly at
stake when decisions are made. This, of course, is not
something that
will happen in the next week or the next year, but it is a
goal that
must be envisioned by greater and greater numbers of people,
including
the people in charge of both corporations and the
government.
There must also be a popular demand to back up the
government's efforts
to limit the size and power of corporations, so that the
public interest
or the national interest is not sacrificed on the
bloodstained altar
of profit. This has nothing to do with socialism or
communism, as
is often the counter argument by conservative circles in the
United
States. It has everything to do with the very fact that in
the Aquarian
age nothing will remain hidden.
We are entering an age now, where transparency will become
the absolute
necessity. In fact, any government organization, any
government, any
corporate structure that seeks to hide something from view
will not
be able to survive in the Aquarian age. And you will, in the
coming
decades, see how these large structures that are based on
deception
will begin to fall like dominoes. Survival of the fittest
will not
be the survival of those who are the most powerful or those
who are
the most deceptive, but those who are the most transparent
and the
most in alignment with the overall progression of humankind,
the overall
goal of raising the consciousness of humankind into the
golden age
consciousness.
In the golden age consciousness we are beyond the
consciousness of
duality that creates a force-based approach to every aspect
of life.
Those corporations who seek to hide, or who use raw power to
maximize
profit, are clearly doing so because they are trapped in the
force-based
mindset—as
I
recently said about the oil industry. They think they
have to
destroy the competition, to force nature, to force
governments, to
do everything by force in order to maximize their profits.
This approach
will no longer work in the Aquarian age. What will work is
complete
transparency, where one seeks to innovate, to be so in tune
with the
forward progression of humankind that one can be an open
door for
the release of new technology that will completely
obliterate the
force-based approach.
This, then, is the greater lesson that can be learned from
this situation.
If it is not learned – and from a realistic perspective, I
suspect
that it will not be learned from this incident – then many
more incidents
like this will occur, even to the point that entire
industries will
break down under the strain.
A final comment is that this incident also underscores what I
said some time ago, namely that the United States needs
to have
an energy policy that clearly defines it as a national goal
to overcome
all dependency upon oil. Lifting a ban on offshore drilling
in order
to remove dependency upon FOREIGN oil is simply not a
substitute for
a deliberate policy to remove oil as a major source of
energy.
There needs to be a complete shift in consciousness, which
is then
turned into a viable policy that seeks to stimulate
innovation and
seeks to remove any ability of big corporations to suppress
technology that they see as a threat to their
monopolistic positions.
If this does not happen, then there will be more incidents
that will
demonstrate just how dangerous it is to rely on oil as the
major source
of energy. If the lesson is not learned the soft way, it
will have
to be learned the hard way until it becomes obvious that oil
is simply
too risky to be relied upon by any nation or by the world as
a whole.
And when there truly is a willingness to rise to a higher
approach
to energy supply, the necessary technology will be brought
forth.
Answer from Jesus, May 28, 2010:
Let me comment on the claim that this oil spill is God
telling humankind
not to drill. This attitude reveals another aspect of the
consciousness
of separation. As Saint Germain said, humankind has entered
into a
consciousness of seeing itself as separated from nature, but
they
also see themselves, of course, as separated from God—who is
the angry,
judgmental being up there in the sky. Or who is the
all-powerful magician
who will grant them personal favors, if only they pray in
the right
way or light candles or do other things. In other words, the
view
of God that is demonstrated by Ted Turner is the
old-fashioned, completely
obsolete view of God that dominated the Piscean age and
previous ages.
God is not the remote being in the sky. There is
no God sitting up there looking at everything that
humankind does
and trying to send messages through events that do not go
the way
human beings expect. If there was such a God up in the sky,
then that
would imply that this God would have the power to stop the
oil spill—and
that because he obviously did not stop the oil spill, then
there must
be some message that God wants to send by not stopping the
oil spill.
This is a completely obsolete view of God.
As Saint Germain said, the entire planet is a feedback
machine. There
is no God that says, “Humankind needs to learn this lesson,
so now
I will precipitate this oil spill so they can wake up.” This
incident
is simply the consequence of what humankind is projecting
out. What
you project into the mirror, the mirror reflects back in the
form
of physical incidents. This is true for the oil spill, this
is true
for the financial collapse, this is true for natural
disasters, as
mother Mary has explained
extensively over the years.
It is not productive in the Aquarian age to maintain the
image that
there is some God – be it an angry, judgmental God or the
all-powerful
magician – sitting on a throne up here in heaven and
responding to
humankind either by punishing people or by rewarding them.
What is
necessary in the Aquarian age is a complete shift in
mindset, where
people realize that what they see outpictured as physical
events is
not something created by a remote God. It is simply the
rather mechanical
consequences of their own actions and state of
consciousness. And
therefore, they can now stop the mindless, ridiculous
attempts to
find a way to please or manipulate the remote God up there
in the
sky.
If you will take an honest look at most mainstream religions
on this
planet, you will see that they are still trapped in this
state of
consciousness, of seeking to find a way to please God by
doing some
kind of prayer or ritual or whatever you can imagine. So
that God
will supposedly grant you a favor, without you having to
change your
state of consciousness, without you having to look at the
beam in
your own eye.
Let me tell you with absolute certainty that when I said,
2,000 years
ago, that people need to stop looking at the splinter in the
eyes
of their brothers and start looking at the beam in their own
eyes,
I was giving humankind a grace period of 2,000 years to
adopt this
state of consciousness. That grace period has run out with
the inauguration
of the Age of Aquarius. There is no more grace period. And
that is
why – if people will not look at their own state of
consciousness,
will not look at the beam in their own eyes – then neither I
nor any
other ascended being will continue to take on people's
karma, to prevent
people's consciousness from being outpictured in physical
events.
There will be, from now on, a much more direct relationship
between
what people are not willing to look at and what will be
outpictured
in physical events. Therefore, people will be so overwhelmed
by physical
events that they will be forced to start looking at the beam
in their
own eye—unless of course people can be awakened in
sufficient numbers
and voluntarily begin to look at their state of
consciousness, and
how it is a certain state of consciousness that has
precipitated any
unbalanced condition found on this planet or in human
society.
This is an absolute necessity. There is no more grace
period, there
is no more Jesus carrying the sins of humankind and
therefore preventing
many physical events from happening. It is absolutely
necessary that
humankind awakens to the reality that there is a direct
connection
between their state of consciousness and any physical
condition found
on this planet.
And this means that humankind must reconsider its attitude
to God.
The view that God is the remote being in the sky that will
punish
or reward you is completely outdated. It is necessary to
adopt a new
view that God is the internal God, who will manifest his
kingdom on
Earth, yet God's kingdom will be manifest only through those
who become
the open doors. So that God's kingdom can be manifest
through them,
and not as the result of some external, all-mighty force in
the sky.
And for this to manifest it is, of course, necessary that a
critical
mass among humankind – and certainly the top
10% – will be awakened to the new reality of the
connection between
consciousness and the physical planet.
This is a shift in consciousness that is long overdue, and
you will
see that if the shift does not happen, then the feedback
machine of
planet Earth will indeed turn up the intensity of both
natural – so-called
– and man-made disasters. This will happen in order to
demonstrate
to humankind that a new approach is needed, for the old
approach is
no longer working. Thinking you can continue the old
approach to God
in this new age of Aquarius – and at the same time expect to
get different
results in the form of a better world – is simply a form of
collective
insanity that will be undeniably challenged by physical
events—both
on a personal and a collective level.
Copyright
© 2010 by Kim Michaels
|
